A special issue on resilience thanks to Open Geography. But it is interesting that one of the strongest lines of critique is (especially in Neocleous), or might be, precisely around how resilience is put together with security and I wonder whether it would be helpful to disentangle them.
The journal Politics which is published by the Political Studies Association, has a new open access issue on resilience and security. The issue was edited by three people at Warwick University, James Brassett, Stuart Croft, and Nick Vaughan-Williams with whom I was not previously familiar.
I look forward to perusing this in detail soon, but it’s worth noting one thing here. The editors open by claiming there’s a kind of gap or slippage in how “resilience” as a concept is put into play (a productive gap they claim). As I noted earlier this year in reply to Mark Neocleous’s anti-resilience piece (with an open access follow-up in Society and Spacehere), if we are to make anything useful with the concept of resilience, then we need to understand how it can improve human well-being (as well as the related question of well-being for whom).
It looks on initial inspection…
View original post 59 more words